Magazine title: BREAKDOWN – Luke Niblett
Minimal Level 1 10 – 23 marks | Basic Level 2 24–35 marks | Proficiency Level 3 36–47 marks | Excellence Level 4 48–60 marks | |
framing a shot, including and excluding elements as appropriate | Photo’s fine but not sure about DPS image | |||
using a variety of shot distances as appropriate | Variety of distance used but guitar and plectrum don’t add much | |||
shooting material appropriate to the task set | Contents photos are weak, crowd image is odd as the faces seen look incredibly bored. DPS needs different photo | |||
selecting mise-en-scène including colour, figure, lighting, objects and setting | Main image too well lit and seems stuck onto cover | |||
manipulating photographs as appropriate to the context for presentation, including cropping and resizing | Don't colour in eyes, doesn’t add anything | |||
accurately using language and register | Contents is too wordy, DPS article is good if too short | |||
appropriately integrating illustration and text | Everything is legible but very ‘safe’ | |||
showing understanding of conventions of layout and page design | No evidence of columns, only THREE things in whole mag, no page no’s, no branding. No grab lines, no fluff etc | |||
showing awareness of the need for variety in fonts and text size | Little to no variety | |||
using ICT appropriately for the task set | Ok |
Summary Comment Luke: this doesn’t ‘look’ or feel like a magazine because neither the contents nor the DPS follow any of the conventions. Use columns, use page numbers, use logo/website on page corners for branding. Why is the name of the magazine on the contents page? Why aren’t your contents broken down into categories? Why is you magazine 14 pages long? How much does it cost? Your article MUST be longer. Look at Q magazines and see how they are laid out. You have a lot of work to do (most of it simple basic tweaks) to get this looking like a magazine. You also need to take more photographs.
0 comments:
Post a Comment